Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment: Alexander: the coverage problem in this case has to do with it incorrectly handling an "else:" clause on a loop (it doesn't adjust the expected target for an empty sequence to be the body of the else clause)
Benjamin: the pragma question is probably worth bringing up on python-dev. In the long run, it would be best to merge coverage data from the test suites of all the major implementations and platforms, but in the meantime we need a way to mark when modules are "done" from the point of view of the CPython test suite. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11572> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
