Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> added the comment: 2011/3/16 Nick Coghlan <rep...@bugs.python.org>: > > Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Alexander: the coverage problem in this case has to do with it incorrectly > handling an "else:" clause on a loop (it doesn't adjust the expected target > for an empty sequence to be the body of the else clause) > > Benjamin: the pragma question is probably worth bringing up on python-dev. In > the long run, it would be best to merge coverage data from the test suites of > all the major implementations and platforms, but in the meantime we need a > way to mark when modules are "done" from the point of view of the CPython > test suite.
There's really no precedent for it. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11572> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
