Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment:

> URLopener which is an old class from the merge of urllib and urllib2
> and it can be slowly and safely removed. If we go this line, then I
> assume it has to have a DeprecationWarning before we remove it. Should
> we or not?

Yes, we should.

> Change URLopener.retrieve also with the cleaner and modern code, but
> and add a DeprecationWarning in those.

Sounds overkill and of questionable interest.
Honestly, I don't think URLopener.retrieve() has much point anyway.
Perhaps it would have if the whole caching thing had been implemented.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10050>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to