David-Sarah Hopwood <david-sa...@jacaranda.org> added the comment:
I wrote:
$ python3 -c 'import sys; sys.stdout.write("foo");
sys.stdout.buffer.write(b"bar"); sys.stdout.write("baz\n")'
barfoobaz
Hmm, the behaviour actually would differ here: the proposed implementation
would print
foobaz
bar
(the "foobaz\n" is written by a call to WriteConsoleW and then the "bar" gets
flushed to stdout when the process exits).
But since the naive expectation is "foobarbaz\n" and you already have to flush
after each call in order to get that, I think this change in behaviour would be
unlikely to affect correct applications.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1602>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
