Ray.Allen <ysj....@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Agreed with nick's idea, the implicitly recreation of the context > > managers would confuse users.
> Uh, why would it? That's exactly what I expect the decorator to do, and > I was astonished to discover that it *doesn't*. Because there is no *OBVIOUS* code or sign which can illustrate that context manager changes from a one-shot to a reusable. When using in "with" statement, it's a one-shot, while using as a decorator, it becomes a reusable. I think the way using it doesn't provide enough reason for its behavior change. Is there somebody who may expected that the GeneratorContextManager IS a one-shot? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11647> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
