Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Antoine, absolument. Please see attached file bug.py
Ah, thanks, I see. But this is not caused by this issue. It seems to come from 12442ac3f7dd. > Instead we should simply define it for python, and in accordance to > established tradition, namely that defaulttimeout prevails. That would be the second behaviour change in two versions. I think we could/should simply fix the advertised behaviour, as in http://docs.python.org/dev/library/socket.html#timeouts-and-the-accept-method > Btw, defaulttimeout(None) doesn't mean that that there is no default, > it means that the default is "blocking." Sure, but generally it means that the user didn't *set* a default at all. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7995> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com