Ezio Melotti <ezio.melo...@gmail.com> added the comment: The attached patch skips the peepholer optimizations for BINARY_SUBSCR if the resulting char is a surrogate on narrow builds or a non-bmp char in wide builds. Note that this affects the optimization of lone surrogates on narrow builds too, but I think it's not worth to adding more complexity on the peepholer and check if they are part of a surrogate pair. The patch still lacks comments and could have better tests.
---------- keywords: +needs review, patch stage: needs patch -> patch review Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21660/issue5057.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5057> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
