Jonas H. <jo...@lophus.org> added the comment: > Is this a problem in our markup or a bug in intersphinx?
It's a markup problem -- those types are documented as functions, using the :func: role/`.. func::` directive. It's not only a markup mismatch but, strictly speaking, it's *wrong* documentation: str, int, ... aren't functions, they're *classes* and should be documented as such. It's a bit odd to search for information on the str *class* in the list of built-in *functions*. > If this work within one documentation set (as I believe it does) It does not. For example, in http://docs.python.org/library/functions.html#max there's a reference to list.sort using :meth:`list.sort` but no link could be generated. How could it possibly work without decent documentation about the list data type? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11975> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
