Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: Okay, thanks. We should still be using ldexp rather than 2.0**... in the tests, though; I've fixed this, and also fixed the incorrect (too small) range for those tests, so that all representable powers of 2 are now covered.
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11888> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
