Brandon Craig Rhodes <bran...@rhodesmill.org> added the comment: But if we allow for ellipsis, then would we not also have to start allowing characters like ≥ and ≤ in Python? And the problem with any of these (admittedly very attractive) substitutions is that they seem to abandon the principle of there being One Obvious Way of typing any given expression. Instead there would now be several alternate ways, with different styles in different codebases and, I think, something of a visual and symbolic mess resulting. I like each symbol to have exactly one possible representation.
---------- nosy: +brandon-rhodes _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12056> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
