STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> added the comment: ssl_rand.patch adds RAND_bytes() and RAND_pseudo_bytes() functions to the ssl module.
I moved /dev/urandom to /dev/urandom.xxx and /dev/random to /dev/random.xxx to test RAND_bytes() error path. In this case, RAND_pseudo_bytes() generates non-cryptographic pseudo-random bytes. RAND_pseudo_bytes() returns a tuple (bytes, is_cryptographic). In test_ssl, I used the assertion that RAND_pseudo_bytes() only generates cryptographic numbers if RAND_status() is 1. If the assertion is wrong, the test can be changed to just test the type of is_crytographic. RAND_bytes() and RAND_pseudo_bytes() raise a SSLError on error using ERR_get_errno() as the error code, whereas other ssl functions uses a value of the py_ssl_error enum. I don't know if it is the good choise. ---------- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21974/ssl_rand_bytes.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12049> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
