Marc-Andre Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> added the comment:
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
>
> Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <amaur...@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Do we need an additional method? It seems that this reset() could also be
> written encoder.encode('', final=True)
+1
I think that's a much more natural way to implement "finalize the
encoding output without adding any data to it".
----------
title: Reset method of the incremental encoders of CJK codecs calls the decoder
reset function -> Reset method of the incremental encoders of CJK codecs
calls the decoder reset function
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12171>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
