Charles-François Natali <neolo...@free.fr> added the comment: Hello Nicholas,
> kqueue is not standardized. You're probably right, but depending on the version of your manpages, the definition changes: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=kevent&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+3.8&arch=i386&format=html defines struct kevent { uintptr_t ident; /* identifier for this event */ short filter; /* filter for event */ u_short flags; /* action flags for kqueue */ u_int fflags; /* filter flag value */ intptr_t data; /* filter data value */ void *udata; /* opaque user data identifier */ }; Now, http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=kevent&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html defines struct kevent { u_int ident; /* identifier for this event */ short filter; /* filter for event */ u_short flags; /* action flags for kqueue */ u_int fflags; /* filter flag value */ int data; /* filter data value */ void *udata; /* opaque user data identifier */ }; The first page hit when searching for "openbsd struct kevent" refers to the first version... > If you can make a case for us to change the layout then maybe... Well, I don't know if you can make such a backward-incompatible change, but for what it's worth, FreeBSD, NetBSD and OS-X all use uintptr_t. But for now I'll gues we'll just add a specific case for OpenBSD. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12181> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
