STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> added the comment: (I should not answer in this issue, but in #8407)
> > See also issue #8407 for sigtimedwait() and signalfd() in Python. > > You didn't commit the signalfd part? Not yet because I would like to provide something to decode the data written into the signalfd file descriptor (msg135438), the signalfd_siginfo structure. > Whay do you think of sigtimedwait? It would like to expose it (msg137071, you should read sigtimedwait, not sigwaitinfo :-)). I started to work on a patch, but it requires a siginfo_t structure, and I didn't finish my patch. I will retry later. > Expose it as-is, or just add an optional timeout option to sigwait? I prefer thin wrappers: sigwaitinfo() is more than just a timeout argument, there is also the signal info argument. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12187> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
