Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: > OK, I'll test it too. Thanks. In case you’re not sure how to test my patch, see http://docs.python.org/devguide/faq#how-do-i-apply-a-patch and http://docs.python.org/devguide/runtests
> I looked sources of packaging. That use packaging.utils.copy_tree. > When I reported that problem, install_scripts used backport.shutil.copytree. Ah, I see a comment in the code that copy_tree should be replaced by shutil.copytree, so we need to get the test anyway to make sure changing the code later will not cause a regression. > Maybe problem is fixed, because it reterned copied file lists. Indeed. > Is that fixies applied to distutils2? distutils2 will be recreated as a backport of packaging. IOW, the packaging module in the 3.3 stdlib is the distutils2 project. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10191> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
