Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: > maybe there's some way to reuse unittest's assertEqual machinery? Hum, I think the diff functionality is cleanly separated in a (private) method, so we could get diff for free.
> I also wonder if the whole environment-changed thing should be moved > into unittest so it could wrap around individual test methods. Yeah, I was thinking about a WatchfulTestRunner that would perform the same checks. It annoys me to have two diverging sets of features to run tests: either checks with regrtest, or failfast, discovery and granularity with unittest. ---------- nosy: +ezio.melotti, michael.foord _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12314> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
