Meador Inge <mead...@gmail.com> added the comment: The functionality part of the patch looks reasonable. However, the pseudo-randomization in the unit tests seems like a bad idea. Say someone is adding a new feature X. Runs the unit tests to find one of them failing. Then runs them again to investigate and they are now passing. Unit tests should be repeatable.
---------- nosy: +meador.inge _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12740> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
