Tom Christiansen <tchr...@perl.com> added the comment: >Ezio Melotti <ezio.melo...@gmail.com> added the comment:
>On wide 3.2 it passes too, so the failure is limited to narrow builds (are = >you sure that it fails on wide builds for you?). You're right: my wide build is not Python3, just Python2. In fact, it's even worse, because it's the stock build on Linux, which seems on this machine to be 2.6 not 2.7. I have private builds that are 2.7 and 3.2, but those are both narrow. I do not have a 3.3 build. Should I? I'm remembering why I removed Python2 from my Unicode talk, because of how it made me pull my hair out. People at the talk wanted to know what I meant, but I didn't have time to go into it. I think this gets added to the hairpulling list. --tom ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12749> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
