higery <shoulderhig...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Current patch has removed old-style scripts support and just retain new-style
wrapper scripts generation support.
Now, it uses only dotted path string to support kind of 'console_scripts' of
setuptools, and uses dotted path with a 'window' or 'win' option to support
kind of 'gui_scripts' of setuptools.
Here is a simple example to show these usecases, in setup.cfg:
scripts =
foo = a.b.c.main
foowin = a.b.c.winmain -window
Then a executable 'foo' file will be generated for Posix platform, console
programm 'foo.exe' and window programm 'foowin.exe' files are generated for
Windows platform. The 'window' option is just used to show that this entry is a
kind of 'gui_scripts' entry to support gui programm wrappers generation.
Now, there is an issue to consider when we make this change:
'scripts' belongs to the 'files' section in setup.cfg, it's still ok now to
place it in 'files'? Still take the above example to say, 'foo=a.b.c.main' and
'foowin=a.b.c.winmain -window' are just dotted path strings to show main
executable entry function, they are not existed files and are only just used to
generate files.
In addition, there are two kinds of configuration files supported in packaing -
setup.py and setup.cfg, and both of them can exist in a project at the same
time , and have different purposes for usage. setup.cfg just offers users a way
to change the default configuration, so I think we should write the dotted
strings in setup.py, do anyone agree with me? Then the above writting way of
'scripts' maybe changed...
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12394>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
