Charles-François Natali <neolo...@free.fr> added the comment: > Well, if we use two different paths based on the libc version, it might not > be a good idea, since behaviour can be different in some cases.
Indeed. > It would be nice to know if some modern platforms have a non-compliant > realpath(). Alas, it doesn't seem to hold for OpenBSD: http://old.nabble.com/Make-realpath(3)-conform-to-SUSv4-td32031895.html A patch supporting NULL was committed two months ago, which means we probably can't push this forward. I've been quite disappointed by POSIX lately... ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12801> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
