Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: > This probably shouldn't be backported to 3.2
Agreed; I don't see this as a bugfix (especially since AFAIK it's not documented that TypeError should be raised here); rather, as a design improvement. > Also, it's worth noting that the error handling between conversion > functions still isn't completely consistent True; there are a number of inconsistencies left. We'll get them all eventually. :-) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12909> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
