Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > I think the >1 character sizes are overly complex in this patch, and > still memchr isn't typically used for them. So I suggest to simplify > the code and restrict it to 1-byte chars only.
I would rather propose to simplify the needle heuristic and only use it when the lower byte is non-zero. A properly optimized memchr() (as in the glibc / gcc) is definitely faster than our naïve loop. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13134> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
