Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: [Terry] > It may suggest a meta-issue though - perhaps 'Documenting Python' > should grow a devguide-style description of the Docs layout in source > control
I would just describe the layout of the Doc subtree in the same devguide page. Care to open another bug for that? > If we consistently applied the "italicize non-literal symbolic parameter > names" > rule to command line examples, we would italicize 'command', 'module-name', > 'script', and 'args' in > > python [-BdEiOQsStuUvVWxX3?] [-c command | -m module-name | script | - ] > [args] > > just like in function signatures. I actually would like that as it would > similarly diffentiate them from the literal constants meant to be entered as > written. Has that ever been discussed by the doc group? Not that I recall. Currently the “python [-Bd etc.]” line is currently a code block, and as such cannot gain inline markup (:file:), but this is not insurmountable. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12602> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
