Meador Inge <mead...@gmail.com> added the comment: > Actually, I think sysconfig does the right thing when it comes to all > the configure-generated HAVE_XXX variables
I agree. The 'configure' script could be improved, though. If we truly want to enable this by default, then the defaulting should be moved to configure. This will give a more accurate portrayal in sysconfig. Also, we can do the USE but !HAVE check in configure, which is better anyway because the error is caught earlier. I am thinking something like the attached. Thoughts? P.S. We could probably get rid of the HAVE macro all together by doing all the work in the 'configure' script. ---------- keywords: +patch nosy: +meador.inge Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file23503/issue13240.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13240> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
