Senthil Kumaran <sent...@uthcode.com> added the comment: I agree with your interpretation of the RFC. The parsing rules do not specify any provision for inclusion of blank lines "within" the records.
However, I find that inclusion is no harm either. I checked that with a robots.txt parser (Google webmaster tools) and presented the last.fm's robots.txt file which had blank line within records. As expected, it did not crib. I would say that we can be lenient on this front and the question would if we allow, would it break any parsing rules? I think, no. The patch does not break any tests, but a new test should be added to reflect this situation. I don't have a strong opinion on having a strict=(True|False) for the blank line accommodation within records(only). I think, it is better we don't add a new parameter and just be lenient. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13281> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
