Charles-François Natali <neolo...@free.fr> added the comment: >> Could it return an opaque wrapper object, rather than just the raw >> address? Something like: > > Are you suggesting that it would return either a Python function object or a > wrapper object?
I think it would be an ugly kludge. I don't like the idea of passing around an opaque "blob" just for that purpose (I mean, it's really a corner case). So I'm -1. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13285> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com