Xavier de Gaye <xdeg...@gmail.com> added the comment: > In this kind of situation, it is perfectly legitimate for the client > to perform a half-duplex close (shutdown(SHUT_WR)), since it does > not intend to send data (which is implied by the fact that the sever > doesn't implement an handle_read() method).
> With the current code, the server will keep sending data until the > remote end close()s its socket. > With this patch, this would break: the server's handle_close() > method will be called right away. Since this patch may break existing valid code, I think it should be closed as invalid. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13311> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
