Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Wouldn't a better alternative be to have a wait function which can > deal with readable pipe connections and integer handles? > > On Unix this would just delegate to select(). > > On Windows it could work as follows: > * initiate an overlapped read on each connection > * call WaitForMultipleObjects() > * cancel each overlapped read > * continue any read which succeeded but only gave a partial message > * store read messages on associated connection objects
This sounds like a good direction to me. (of course it must also preserve existing functionality; test_concurrent_futures will check for that) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11836> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
