Collin Winter <coll...@gmail.com> added the comment: I assume I was added to this thread since I wrote the functional module, so I'll give my take in that capacity. IMO Python doesn't need a more general version of partial(); indeed, I question the need for partial() as it is today. Querying Google Code Search for code using partial, I haven't found any usages in the wild where partial() makes code more readable than simply defining a new function. partial() is almost always a loss for readability.
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13430> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
