Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment:

Thanks for the fixed links amk.  I think they can be fixed in the repo right 
now.

[Eli]
> I still think it's a bigger problem that the page discusses a module which
> is not available on Python 3.x - this means that a user following the page
> can't just type in the code and make it run.
It’s only one section that’s affected, so +1 to replacing its contents with 
just a link and short description (“the functional module does X and Y for 
Python 2”).  Before doing that, would you have the time to contact its author 
and inquire about porting plans?

(BTW, the file is also inconsistent in its use of :: vs. implicit code blocks; 
I wonder if that affects doctest or the “hide prompts” button.)

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13443>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to