Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> added the comment: Hm, this change allows many other *undesirable* objects pass the test as well. I'd prefer to stick to the rule, "when in doubt, raise an error". Maybe using == instead of 'is' as the test would be acceptable?
---------- nosy: +gvanrossum _______________________________________ Python tracker <[email protected]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13479> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
