Philip Jenvey <pjen...@underboss.org> added the comment: Is mro_internal's second call to type_mro_modified still needed? Its comment makes me suspect that it's not:
type_mro_modified(type, type->tp_mro); /* corner case: the old-style super class might have been hidden from the custom MRO */ type_mro_modified(type, type->tp_bases); ---------- nosy: +pjenvey _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13575> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com