Meador Inge <mead...@gmail.com> added the comment: With the new patch I see no benefits on the same micro-benchmarks you posted (it is even slower for the smaller case) on a quad-core 64-bit F15 box:
BEFORE: $ ./python -mtimeit "def y(n):" " for x in range(n):" " yield x" "sum(y(10))" 1000000 loops, best of 3: 1.33 usec per loop $ ./python -mtimeit "def y(n):" " for x in range(n):" " yield x" "sum(y(1000000))" 10 loops, best of 3: 66 msec per loop AFTER: $ ./python -mtimeit "def y(n):" " for x in range(n):" " yield x" "sum(y(10))" 1000000 loops, best of 3: 1.45 usec per loop $ ./python -mtimeit "def y(n):" " for x in range(n):" " yield x" "sum(y(1000000))" 10 loops, best of 3: 65.8 msec per loop ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13607> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
