Tim Golden <m...@timgolden.me.uk> added the comment:

This is happening on Windows x86 against the current tip. The MS C runtime can 
handle older dates; it's just that we're taking 1900 off the year at some 
point. (At least, I think that's what's happening). FWIW you only need 
time.strftime to reproduce the error:

  import time
  time.strftime("%y", (1899, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0))

If no-one gets there first I'll dig into the timemodule strftime wrapper.

----------
nosy: +tim.golden

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13674>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to