Joonas Kuorilehto <jones...@derbian.fi> added the comment: Updating the issue with version 3.2 tag since it was fixed there as well. Still fixed, of course.
You are correct that the encodings can be tricky. Luckily I only added coding to tests. But you're right, I would consider very carefully before using similar code outside tests. I just realized what's the impact of this change on python3.2 really. Since urllib.request.urlopen (for some reason) does not allow username and password on the URI, it is not possible to hit this with that, I think. But FancyURLopener does allow using user-pass in url, so this bug was reachable. I just verified that and the fix :) Fix does the trick for FancyURLopener when the username and password are passed in the URL. ---------- versions: +Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13642> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
