Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > a) Make all functions and the two buffer access macros part > of the limited API again.
Hmm, I don't think buffer access macros should be part of the limited API. If they are truely important (which I doubt), we should have equivalent functions for them. > I think it might be OK to defer the decision about Py_MEMORYVIEW_C etc., > since the comment already says "... Don't access their fields directly.". My question is whether there is any point in making these flags. Does 3rd-party code want to manipulate memoryview internals, instead of querying the Py_buffer? (and of course the memoryview object is becoming more and more like another Py_buffer :-)) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10181> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
