Martin v. Löwis added the comment: I think it is neither possible nor "good" to produce a uniform result. Python traditionally exposes APIs "as-is", providing the system actually has an API with the same name. It never tries to hide differing system behaviors in the Python wrapper; if systems vary and it is desirable to provide a uniform API, a different API is added.
However, it is also not possible to make that uniform, as getsockname(3) gives an unspecified result, so it is not possible for Python to actually determine whether there was a meaningful result. Closing as rejected. ---------- nosy: +loewis resolution: -> rejected status: open -> closed __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1049> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
