Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment:
> IOW, globbing is usually understood as the act of expanding a pattern
> to the files it matches. Nothing in that implies recursive traversal
> of a directory tree.
Still, that's a common need. "I want all Python files in a subtree".
> On the other hand, os.walk and/or walkdir suggest that in their name.
I don't know why "walk" is supposedly more recursive than "glob".
> Admittedly, we already have more than one, and a high-level tool is
> proposed with Nick's walkdir. Why add *yet another* high-level tool?
Because the walkdir spelling (IIUC) is longish, tedious and awkward.
I could see myself typing "rglob('*.py')" in a short script or an
interpreter session, without having to look up any kind of docs.
Certainly not the walkdir alternative (I've already forgotten what it
is).
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13968>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
