R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment: It's not a patch if it is the whole file. A diff would be much more useful, since then we could see the changes easily.
This kind of change would require a bit of discussion. I'm doubtful that it would be applied as a bug fix, and we might even want the validation to be optional and not the default. Part of the issue is that urlparse was originally based on the older standards, as you can see from the docstring. You may find others to agree with you, but personally it doesn't look to me like this rises to the level of a security issue. ---------- nosy: +orsenthil _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14036> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
