Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment:

Hah, I've been dealing with Python's regression test suite for 8+ years and 
there are still cases where I don't understand the rationale for testing things 
a particular way (beyond "it must have seemed like a good idea at the time"). 
It has a lot more historical cruft than the standard library does :)

The "proper" location for a particular test can be a bit of a coin toss in many 
cases, but one useful guide (which applies in this case) is to try to avoid 
adding *new* standard library dependencies to a test module if there's an 
alternate suitable location that already has those dependencies.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14136>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to