Stefan Krah <stefan-use...@bytereef.org> added the comment: Mark Dickinson <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > FWIW, I think we would be better off if this patch were merged in soon. > > +1
OK, I'm counting three +1 for merging soon. Thanks everyone for the encouragement! I'll then proceed with the merge this weekend or shortly after, with one caveat: My *second* self-review of mpdecimal.c is currently at 17%, but I can as well continue with that if the whole thing is merged. I'll probably replace the caching of ln(10) (not thread-safe, protected by the GIL) with a real thread-safe version. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7652> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
