sbt <shibt...@gmail.com> added the comment: > I think this captures the functionality better than "duplicate" or > duppid() since there is no actual duplication involved until the > fromshare() function is called.
Are you saying the WSADuplicateSocket() call in share() doesn't duplicate the handle in to the target process? I am pretty sure it does. (Delaying handle duplication till WSASocket() is called in the target process would be rather problematic since then you cannot close the original socket in the source processes until you know the duplication has occurred.) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14310> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
