Stefan Krah <stefan-use...@bytereef.org> added the comment: To prevent further confusion. :)
db154e62ac03 -> OK 5fe7d19ec49a -> failure 5fe7d19ec49a with #undef patch -> OK So I don't know if it is better to revert to db154e62ac03 or to use the #undef patch. Jeff, you originally said: 'An extension which includes both Windows.h and Python.h won't compile due to the Windows.h definition of "small".' Did you include Python.h before or after Windows.h? Extensions are supposed to include Python.h before anything else. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14387> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
