Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > The thing to emphasise here is that pickling an iterator is > "destructive": afterwards the original iterator will be "empty".
If you look at the patch it isn't (or shouldn't be). I agree with Raymond that accumulating dict and set iterators in a list is a bit weird. That said, with hash randomization, perhaps we can't do any better (the order of elements in the internal table depends on the process-wide hash seed). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14288> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
