Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > I found this comprehensive description of the '**' convention at > http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/2809/Recursive-patterned-File-Globbing > that can translate directly to unittests. > > I'd like to fix the patch for these specs but should it be in a new > rglob function or in the existing glob.glob()? I think it should be a > new one to avoid any edge-case compatibility concerns even though on > face value there shouldn't be any.
I think it should be the existing glob.glob(). We won't introduce a new function any time we add a new syntactic feature in the glob mini-language. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13968> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
