Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > I'm not bothered by the regression in "silent_logging", > as it is a micro benchmark with a very short running time.
I'm not concerned about the micro-benchmark itself but the fact that it might hint at a wider problem. Also, I don't get your remark about it running in a short time. Your patch AFAICT doesn't need any warm up period to exhibit any improvements. > Reducing the method-cache size from 2**10 to 2**9 allows the working > set to fit better in the cache. > This fixes the regression in "mako", but makes OO programs that use > few objects (such as richards) a bit slower. I don't think we should reduce the size of the method cache. 1024 is not a very large number, and might even be too small for complex OO programs. I also think that, apart from the dict storage changes, your patch should strive not to change any other tunables. Otherwise we're really comparing apples to oranges. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13903> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com