Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> added the comment:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Marc-Andre Lemburg <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > You don't really expect anyone to remember such rules, do you ? :-) No, but it is still a one-line function that those who need it can easily implement. I am on the fence here because we already have date.isocalendar() function, so it is natural to desire its inverse, but still at least on this side of the pond an Easter(year) date constructor would see more use than that. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14423> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
