Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: Le mercredi 11 avril 2012 à 11:32 +0000, Charles-François Natali a écrit : > One can imagine, for example, that another implementation (or maybe > CPython in a later version) exposes native condition variables on > POSIX, instead of emulating them (e.g. what happended for TLS > implementation).
That's right, but spurious wakeups would be a good argument against accepting such an implementation. Or that implementation should be fixed to avoid them. That said, we couldn't use the POSIX implementation anyway, since our API allows the user to choose the type of lock, while POSIX AFAICT would only accept a POSIX mutex (which doesn't have the same semantics as an arbitrary Python lock). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8799> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
