Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Ok, that sounds reasonable, particularly in light of that > _NewReference stuff. I'll work out a different patch then. But I > think the API must be public, since it would need to work from > extension modules.
Needing to work from (stdlib) extension modules and being public are too different things. I don't think we want to encourage third-party types to resurrect their instances. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8212> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
