Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: > Having meditated on it, I think either I should either just call > PyErr_Occured, check for explicit failure (val < 0), or explicit success > (val >= 0). I've opted for the last of those.
Yes, I think that works; it avoids a relatively expensive PyErr_Occurred() call in the non-failure case. The new code looks fine to me! ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14705> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
